Início/XIAOMI POCO F3 GT
XIAOMI POCO F3 GT
Desempenho
Câmera
Autonomia
Tela
Capacidade
Design
O mais barato
Desconhecido
Características XIAOMI POCO F3 GT
Tamanho6.67 "
RAM8 GB
Capacidade256 GB
AnTuTu677147
Capacidade5065 mAh
Descrição
O smartphone XIAOMI POCO F3 GT é um dispositivo com uma performance robusta, projetado para atender às necessidades dos usuários que buscam eficiência e conectividade. Equipado com 8 GB de memória RAM, ele oferece uma navegação suave e capacidade de multitarefa sem esforço.
A câmera do POCO F3 GT entrega resultados satisfatórios. Com várias funções ajustáveis, ele é capaz de capturar momentos importantes com clareza adequada. Além disso, seu display também propicia uma experiência visual satisfatória, ideal para consumos de conteúdo multimídia.
A autonomia do dispositivo é reforçada por uma bateria de 5065 mAh, o que é suficiente para sustentar o uso diário sem necessidade de recargas constantes. Mesmo com um uso intenso, o smartphone consegue manter um bom desempenho ao longo do dia.
No que diz respeito ao armazenamento, o POCO F3 GT vem equipado com uma capacidade de 256 GB, o que é mais do que suficiente para armazenar uma grande quantidade de dados, incluindo fotos, vídeos, aplicativos e muito mais. A capacidade de armazenamento eficiente permite que os usuários mantenham seus arquivos importantes sempre à mão, sem preocupações com falta de espaço.
Em termos de design, o aparelho apresenta um visual moderno e atraente, com uma construção de qualidade que exibe uma boa ergonomia e conforto ao manusear.
Por fim, o POCO F3 GT é compatível com a tecnologia 5G, garantindo acesso à mais recente e rápida tecnologia de rede para uma conexão super veloz, ideal para streaming de vídeo, jogos online e downloads rápidos. Embora não possua carregamento sem fio ou NFC, o conjunto de características técnicas compensa, oferecendo um equilíbrio interessante entre funcionalidade e custo-benefício.
Histórico de preços
mín
máx
fixo
Produtos com características similares
Avaliações
Bishal K.C.
Heating ,Technical problems ,Bluetooth low sound
-100% for poco f3 gt
Neenyah
Very true Sakib, great suggestion and it would be quite useful to see it added for future reviews. It's not even important just for games but for general usage; my old OnePlus 5T was horrible in that regard and just trying to rotate it quickly to watch any video in full screen was an impossible task sometimes and all games where gyro was needed were quite unplayable because of how slow it was to react. Unpleasant experience with a great phone back then.
Sakib Mohd
Since many popular mobile games rely on gyroscope these days. Gyroscope responsiveness should also be tested to see how fast and responsive gyroscope feels. iPhones has good and fast gyro and some android phones has fast gyroscope sensor too but not all. Sometimes even flagships has bad gyroscope performance in games.
Reza
Hello . Is pwm it really 50,000 Hz?! And is there a mobile phone that has more PWM?That is, more than 50,000 Hz
Michael sami
In the professional mobile gaming community. Its very likely to have poco f4 gt Its very reliable and i do highly recommend it. But again if you are an below-average player with no need for such great mechanics and smoothness in game (or video editing per example) You might find cheaper options
NikoB
And against lidars and infrared sensors and ultrasonic and microwave sensors, no electrical tape helps. We ourselves voluntarily carry in our pocket and keep with us 24x365 devices, which are the ideal spy device for wiretapping and video recording. Moreover, there are more and more methods of hiding this unauthorized activity at the level of industrial equipment and software, and not vice versa.
NikoB
I also want to draw attention to one nasty trend - on smartphones with a hole in the screen, where the camera is located, it is extremely difficult to close it with tape, unlike classic smartphones and smartphones with a strip at the top. You will almost never be able to make a solid permanent shutter for this camera. Most adequate people immediately close it with black tape or something else, because. on smartphones, unlike decent laptops, there is not even a light that the camera is actually turned on and transmits information about you and the environment somewhere. As well as forcibly made non-switchable microphones. All this is a conspiracy to infiltrate the masses with 24x365 devices spying on them. Most gave up and ended up in a digital concentration camp, turning themselves and their homes into a glass aquarium for large corporations, intelligence agencies and criminals who got exploits or took advantage of fools with the help of social engineering.
NikoB
Quote from: Don on December 11, 2022, 22:14:27 Quote from: Don on December 11, 2022, 22:14:27 You are wrong, like most. Reviews of laptops with AMOLED screens, as well as smartphones, clearly indicate that with hardware calibration they almost always lose to good IPS in terms of color accuracy. And the owners of even top-end OLED TVs abandon them in favor of projectors with much worse contrast, but with much better color reproduction without banding (banding on gradients) and without poor color reproduction in the dark hue region. Look at many reviews - a typical AMOLED laptop screen can't even be calibrated with dE less than 2, where most IPS with 72%+ NTSC pass the test easily... This is a deliberate marketing lie (as well as the forceful suppression of the truth in large media about flicker harmful to the eyes and nervous system, which has already been proven by science a long time ago) thrown into the masses. Even a head-on comparison of the "top" AMOLED screens in the demo areas of stores on the stands of smartphones easily reveals the winner - IPS.
Don
I like your way of reviewing, very detailed and comprehensive. However for instance there is a portion about pwm on screens which is not present in other sites. Even though you measure and bring it front, you also complain about the LCD screen phones. This one and other good LCD screen phones have less or no flickering thanks to this technology. However you're at the end complaining about them being LCD but not Amoled. If Amoled is better then why do you pay attention to pwm? Personally pwm is an issue for me but the way Amoled is promoted doesn't make sense. I understand the colors are better but considering the reviewing criteria it becomes confusing at the end.