Início/SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
Características SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
Tamanho7.6 "
RAM12 GB
Capacidade1000 GB
AnTuTu964532
Capacidade4400 mAh
Descrição
O Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 é um smartphone que combina tecnologia de ponta e design inovador. Equipado com uma memória RAM de 12 GB, ele oferece um desempeho robusto que pode lidar com várias tarefas ao mesmo tempo sem perder a fluidez. As características da câmera são boas, permitindo capturar imagens nítidas e vibrantes.
O dispositivo possui uma bateria de 4400 mAh, que garante uma autonomia satisfatória para o uso diário. Sua capacidade de armazenamento é impressionante, chegando a 1000 GB, o que o torna muito bom para armazenar uma vasta quantidade de dados e aplicativos sem preocupações com espaço.
O display do Galaxy Z Fold4 é uma peça chave, oferecendo boa qualidade visual que se destaca tanto no uso diário quanto em mídias que exigem maior resolução e detalhes.
O design do aparelho é bem avaliado, com uma estética moderna e funcionalidades que ressaltam a conveniência, como o carregamento sem fio. Além disso, o dispositivo é compatível com tecnologia NFC e oferece suporte à rede 5G, garantindo conectividade rápida e eficiente para navegação e download.
Histórico de preços
mín
máx
fixo
Produtos com características similares
Avaliações
Anthony Rios
Excelente el mejor teléfono que eh tenido
Te cambia muchísimo la perspectiva de telefonl a tablet
AnonWolf
Excelente celular, con mínimos detalles
Considero que es un excelente celular y que puedes hacer muchas cosas con el, tiene buenas pantallas, y en la productividad es excelente, sus cámaras no son las mejores pero son bastante buenas, de batería mantiene una buena duración, también es bastante resistente y tiene un buen procesador
Anonymous
dont buy fold. just after 3-4 months there were display problems. company didnot respond because its warranty for 3 months only. if display problem araises.. you have to pay 60k. better go for any other model except fold series.
Hans Paternotte
Kostbare kwetsbare prul met een beroerde garantie.
Na een Fold 3 waarvan binnen een jaar de display los liet vol verwachting een Fold 4 gekocht. Volgens Samsung stof en spatwaterdicht. Binnen drie maanden na aankoop zand in het scharnier. Ik had mijn broekzak na een bezoek aan het strand niet helemaal uitgeklopt. Direct bij openen pixelstoringen in het display. Samsung NL wilde geen garantie geven omdat men stelde dat het toestel zou zijn gevallen wat absoluut niet het geval was en ook nergens waarneembaar. Samsung Tsjechië heeft hierna het toestel wel onder garantie gerepareerd en niets vermeld over een vermeende val. Echter nu, naar zes maanden, zelfde probleem. weer zand in het scharnier en pixel uitval. Ik ga niet meer terug naar Samsung want ik hoor al weer dezelfde aanname. Nooit meer een Fold en ook nooit meer een Samsung. Kostbare kwetsbare prul. Overigens heeft een vriend van mij die tegelijk met mij de Fold 4 kocht precies hetzelfde probleem. Ook met de accu van de Fold 4 kom je met moeite de dag door.
Anonymous
I had bought Samsung galaxy Z fold 4 in January last year and it worked very well and was useful for 1st year. Then 3 months after expiry of my phone's manufacturer warranty, one day the WiFi stopped working. I looked for online help and realised it's a hardware issue. Then I headed to Samsung galaxy store. After explaining the issue briefly, the attendant smiled and replied, It will take at least one week and AED 1650 to fix the issue. This is more than 1/4th of original phone cost. I decided not to repair it until I have a spare phone. In the following week the display started flickering. Then one days I realised second SIM slot was not working and later on even the first SIM slot stopped working. Next day the front camera stopped working and few hours later the front display stopped working. The only way to use the phone was through big internal screen which also stopped working next day. Now this phone is absolutely useless with all my data not backed up because of WiFi and SIM slot issue...
When I asked for quotation from other mobile phone service centers they said this issue is very common and the screen costs a bomb with which all the other parts are connected and repairing the phone is impractical because of exorbitant costs.
When I shared this with my colleagues they advised me to put this experience in public forum for awareness. And hence this long post. Thanks for reading and avoid buying into this primitive technology.
Cooe
"The aspect ratio went from 25:9 to 23.1:9.
As those numbers strongly imply, the problem is that it's less tall by only a teeny tiny amount, and so the issue with typing on the outer screen remains"
🤦 ... What an utterly crap, absolutely nonsensical take... 😑 While a +3mm increase in display width doesn't sound like much in absolute terms, it most definitely WAS in relative terms as that's a SIGNIFICANT difference in aspect ratio! It basically cut the gap between it and a reasonably normal, ala Z Flip's, ≈22:9 aspect ratio practically in HALF!!! And the difference in day-to-day usability on that front display was legit dramatic! (I've owned & used both a Fold 3 & 4 for long periods of time.)
This is literally like saying a modern ≈19:9 phone and an old-school ≈16:9 phone's display shapes are "different by only a teeny tiny amount"... 🤦 ... 😑
Also, making the front screen even wider will turn the internal tablet display into an awful SQUARE that's garbage for BOTH watching widescreen media in landscape and scrolling through modern vertical app feeds & webpages in portrait!
That's is actually the exact problem that the OnePlus Open has. Thanks to that "normal sized/width" 20:9 front display, despite it having a SIGNIFICANTLY larger tablet display in total area, the viewable 16:9 media area on it is actually slightly SMALLER than on a Fold 4/5 simply because the screen is so ridiculously freaking square!!! (≈9:8 vs Fold 4/5's ≈6:5)
Cooe
"The new, more squarish, aspect of the screen may have some minor implications on its usability (positive ones, we'd say)"
Uhh... What the hell are you even talking about???... O_o The main interior display's more wide/square aspect ratio is nothing but a NEGATIVE in terms of usability! It means bigger empty black bars when watching widescreen media in landscape and an inferior experience for scrolling through modern vertical app feeds and website layouts in portrait. In addition, the wider, squarer display also makes it harder and more uncomfortable to type if you don't use a split layout keyboard.
(Heck, due to text size limitations, you can't even really fit much more "webpage" on screen at once in most cases, with it instead simply leading to more empty unused space on the left & right side of the device when browsing!)
All that said, don't get me wrong here, the aspect ratio changes Samsung made with the Fold 4 were still COMPLETELY the right & correct call overall!!! That extra +3mm of front cover display width makes an absolutely GARGANTUAN difference to its overall usability that CANNOT BE OVERSTATED!!! ESPECIALLY for things like two hand typing!
But trying to also pretend like the internal display now being more square shaped as a result is somehow a "positive thing for usability" is absolutely freaking absurd... 🤦😑 ... Having bigger black bars and more empty unused space is literally NEVER a "positive for usability" lol. 🤷
Cooe
"The fine print starts with the fact that the main camera on the Fold4 is based on the Samsung GN3 sensor, whereas the S22s have an GN5 at the core. Both sensors have a 1/1.56" optical format, 50million 1.0µm pixels, and a Tetrapixel filter array (Quad Bayer in Sony speak).
Where the two differ is in the autofocusing - the GN5 uses Dual Pixel Pro, while the GN3 in the Fold4 relies on a slightly less sophisticated Dual Pixel method."
🤦😑 WRONG!!! The Samsung ISOCELL GN3 camera sensor used in the Galaxy Fold 4 is the newer & superior version of that sensor design to the older ISOCELL GN5 used in the S22 lineup, NOT the other way around!!! This is why the GN3 is the sensor that Samsung has continued to reuse on literally every flagship since right up to this very day (S23, Fold 4, S24), not the GN5!
If it really does have the older "Dual Pixel" instead of the "Dual Pixel Pro" autofocusing system, then that just means that Samsung either decided the latter wasn't worth using and switched back OR even more likely, you just have that backwards and it's the newer GN3 with Dual Pixel Pro support... 🤦
Cooe
"The cover screen of the Fold4 also got a change of aspect, moving away from the 25:9 (that's nearly 3:1, if you hadn't thought it that way) to a more manageable 23.1:9, while maintaining the diagonal."
This is wrong!!! The Fold 3's cover display had a ≈24.5:9 aspect ratio, NOT ≈25:9! It was the Fold 2's front display that was actually ≈25:9.
(Fold 3 had ever so slightly slimmer front display bezels vs Fold 2 which made the cover screen about +1mm wider, and thus evvvvver so slightly less narrow.)