Behoof logo

Behoof

Melhores preços nas lojas online
Catálogo de produtos
search

previous
next

ASUS TUF GAMING A15 (2023) 15.6" FHD AMD RYZEN 7 7735HS 3.5GHZ / NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4060 LAPTOP / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Desempenho

Tela

Tarjeta grafica

Autonomia

Capacidade

Conectores

crown O mais barato

R$ 6.099,22

mercadolivre.com.br
diagram

Preço estável

Nos últimos 30 dias, o preço não mudou

Características ASUS TUF GAMING A15 (2023) 15.6" FHD AMD RYZEN 7 7735HS 3.5GHZ / NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4060 LAPTOP / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Tamanho15.6 "

RAM16 GB

VRAM8 GB

Capacidade512 GB

PassMark (G3D)16709

Descrição

Dados não encontrados

Histórico de preços

mín

máx

fixo

R$ 6.099,22

mercadolivre.com.br

Frete gratis

mín

máx

fixo

Avaliações

mercadolivre.com.br

Mercadolibre usuario

16.11.2024

Veio sem lacre na caixa.

notebookcheck.net

Jerk Duck

29.08.2024

Hey y'all, thanks soooo much for these amazing in-depth reviews. This is the ONLY website that I disable my ad blockers in Brave browser. Well done, please keep the reviews coming!

notebookcheck.net

Hamed

27.08.2024

Hello Thank you because of the article. I have a question about batterylife between this model (with 2.5k screen) and a16 fa607pv(2.5k screen). My priority is batterylife not performance. Which one does have a better battery?

notebookcheck.net

Andre8888

16.01.2024

Thank you guys for the review. As always amazing job!

notebookcheck.net

NikoB

08.01.2024

I really don't understand how the most efficient Zen4 can be noisier than the hot Intel?! Is this intentional damage to the laptop and cooling system by Asus at the behest of Intel (of course not for free)? Otherwise, this model has been on the market for a long time (15.6" with 4070 costs $1300 with a 2.5k screen) since spring 2023. And there are about the same unsuccessful architectural solutions. The main problem with the 17.3 is that it has been almost impossible to find a 2.5K screen model in retail since the spring, and in most countries of the world. Due to the stupid greed of Acus, a cheap ddr5 4800 is installed, not 5600, and what's even worse is two modules of 8, and not one of 16, in order to immediately get working 32GB. It would be better if they sold it with a 4GB module - at least you wouldn't mind throwing it away right away. Poor location of the power port, which blocks the exhaust of the cooling system on the left. Why it couldn't be done from behind is unclear. Well, Asus's greed for ports - instead of 2 USB40s built into the SoC (which made it difficult to bring out the second one, on the right, it's unclear), as usual, only one was brought out (in 15.6 it's the same). Yes, and USB-a is defective, not Gen2. The keyboard can also be improved, especially by 17.3" - the keys have more travel, their sizes in width and height (Esc, Fx...) and the numberpad of course. The screen must be strictly 16:10. But Asus marketers left all this for the strix 18" series, in which they ruined the numpad (right arrow in the place of insert) and besides, it is only on Intel. Although this is not what makes it different at all... Asus' attempts to cut and sew only lead to the fact that most of these models gather dust in warehouses and shelves until the price is significantly reduced from the indicated...

notebookcheck.net

NikoB

06.07.2023

I will explain to you popularly what is the difference between real IPS and "IPS Level": 1. True IPS screens have an A-TW polarizer (special coating) that eliminates Glow effects when the viewing angle deviates from perpendicular to the screen plane. 2. Real IPS always have viewing angles of 178/178, and more often a contrast drop of 15:1, and not 10:1, as on "IPS Level". 3. Color depth on IPS is at least 8-10 bits. At IPS Level, most often 6+2(frc)/8+2(frc). 4. True IPS usually have a minimum of 95%+ AdobeRGB space. Most often, point 1, which is key in terms of criticality, is not fulfilled. That is why on the "IPS Level" there are monstrous highlights at the viewing angle with all the Glow effects, which even with a contrast of 1800:1+, as on LG "Black IPS" panels, still gives unpleasant effects when viewing, for example, video content in complete darkness. And with the A-TW polarizer, even the 1200:1 contrast panel looks much better visually than LG's "Black IPS" 1800:1. LG is the only one on the planet that holds patents for the A-TW polarizer and does not allow anyone to apply them. Well, the price of such a coating increases the price of the panel, which naturally reduces the desire of manufacturers to try to repeat this technology independently. It's easier for them to give hamsters to a glare glossy AMOLED with low-frequency PWM than to deal with the creation of decent versions of real IPS panels, which, moreover, with an A-TW polarizer will consume much more, at the same brightness level as on conventional "IPS Level" AntiGlare panels LG recently released 2 monitors for the first time in 8-10 years with a 32/27 inch A-TW polarizer, but unfortunately on regular IPS panels with 1000:1, not on high contrast "Black IPS".  With what it is connected, it is not clear. It would seem to make Black IPS panels with a native contrast of 1800:1+ and with an A-TW polarizer and only manage to sell lots...but apparently LG is not interested or for some reason they are not able to do it technologically.

notebookcheck.net

Neenyah

06.07.2023

"IPS-level" rog.asus.com/laptops/rog-flow/rog-flow-x13-2023-series/spec/ Yeah, they say that for almost all their laptops, here is Flow X13 2023 as example:

notebookcheck.net

RobertJasiek

06.07.2023

"IPS" is a type of display. "level" is nothing but PR void. Ask Asus why it uses PR language!

notebookcheck.net

LL

06.07.2023

Why notebookcheck calls this an IPS screen when Asus says it is "IPS level"?