Behoof logo

Behoof

Melhores preços nas lojas online
Catálogo de produtos
search

previous
next

ACER NITRO 17 AN17-51-70AA 17.3" INTEL CORE I7-13700H 2.4GHZ / NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4050 LAPTOP / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Desempenho

Tela

Tarjeta grafica

Autonomia

Capacidade

Conectores

crown O mais barato

R$ 7.899

mercadolivre.com.br
diagram

Bom preço

Com base nos últimos 30 dias, o preço atual está -R$ 24.684 abaixo do normal

Características ACER NITRO 17 AN17-51-70AA 17.3" INTEL CORE I7-13700H 2.4GHZ / NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4050 LAPTOP / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Tamanho17.3 "

RAM16 GB

VRAM6 GB

Capacidade512 GB

PassMark (G3D)17148

Descrição

Dados não encontrados

Histórico de preços

mín

máx

fixo

R$ 7.899

mercadolivre.com.br

Frete gratis

mín

máx

fixo

Produtos com características similares

SAMSUNG GALAXY BOOK3 PRO 14" INTEL CORE I7-1360P 2.2GHZ / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Notebooks

SAMSUNG GALAXY BOOK3 PRO 14"

Preço 0

5679.00
Ir para o produto

Avaliações

mercadolivre.com.br

Mercadolibre usuario

24.11.2023

Muito bom! dentro das expectativas.

notebookcheck.net

Superguy

11.09.2023

Quote from: NikoB on September 08, 2023, 23:36:20 Quote from: NikoB on September 08, 2023, 23:36:20 Oh give me a break, from comments about pro monitors on a gaming laptop and the communist diatribe. You're comparing a monitor for a gaming laptop that isn't designed for what you're complaining about.  If you want something that, there are tons of creator laptops out there that have better screens that handle the high quality color better, albeit at lower refresh rates and higher response times. They're designed for gaming with the low response time and high refresh rate. It's a decent display for what it is, and if it's the same one on the Predator Helios, it's pretty good overall.  Light bleed has been a problem on the Acers for awhile now, though.

notebookcheck.net

NikoB

09.09.2023

Quote from: julia_top on September 09, 2023, 12:45:44 Quote from: julia_top on September 09, 2023, 12:45:44 Incorrect definition - Zen4 Phoenix is not compatible, but has built-in HDMI 2.1 48Gbps and 2 x USB40 ports 40Gbps, plus 2 x USB 10Gbps ports (variable setup for -A/-C) + 4 USB 2.0 ports. Again, capitalist freaks, for the sake of artificial division of lines and maximizing profits, artificially worsen the characteristics of laptops with Zen4 Phoenix, often bringing out by downgrading the protocol version not HDMI 2.1, but the shameful antique 2.0b and instead of 2 x USB40 located strictly symmetrically on the left and right, as was the case originally conceived in the built-in TB4/USB40 controllers by Intel/AMD developers, they output at best 1 port on one side or, in rare cases, 2 ports on one side, and more often they output nothing at all except the obsolete usb-c without support for the USB40 protocol. Humanity, after the rapid development and progress of the end of the 20th century and the first 10 years of the 21st century, is rapidly plunging into a new neo-medieval age, which is skillfully created by moral monsters in large corporations and on the Internet. Unfortunately, through their criminal efforts, the civilian layer of the population is being emasculated and thinning out, and the majority of the population is rapidly becoming dumber. We are heading towards complete idiocracy and degradation of civilization, the majority of the population. Since the 2010s, civilization has begun to rapidly reverse in terms of human progress in a positive way.

notebookcheck.net

NikoB

09.09.2023

Quote from: LL on September 09, 2023, 00:00:51 Quote from: LL on September 09, 2023, 00:00:51 I have owned a 94%+ AdobeRGB monitor for over 15 years (which also only has a 7ms G2G) and I don't understand why in 2023 I should buy something worse, like the majority of the world's population. I also own a top-end camera with AdobeRGB and I don't even think about shooting in poor sRGB, even if there is such a choice in the menu, like 100% of professionals. The world should strive for the better, not for the worse, and filthy capitalists, for the sake of maximizing profits, have been driving humanity into the dark ages for many years, bringing the situation to the point of absurdity with a shameful 45-46% NTSC, specifically for display panels. And social totalitarians like the moral monster Zuckerberg and others like him help in this in every possible way. Only a narrow layer of decent civil activists is trying to fight all this, the herd is already sadly wandering to the next slaughterhouse and contributing to the development of monsters...

notebookcheck.net

Neenyah

09.09.2023

🦜

notebookcheck.net

julia_top

09.09.2023

He must have put an AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix and he would have saved himself a lot of trouble. Let's not forget that Zen 4 is compatible with HDMI 2.1 and UBS 40 and DDR 5

notebookcheck.net

Neenyah

09.09.2023

Quote from: NikoB on September 08, 2023, 23:36:20 Quote from: NikoB on September 08, 2023, 23:36:20 https://www.eizoglobal.com/products/coloredge/cg319x/ Ah yes, let's compare a professional-grade monitor with specific purpose like this Eizo - - with a general-purpose laptop and call that laptop amateur and 💩 because it's not as good. Let's disregard the fact that the whole laptop is almost 3.5x cheaper than that monitor 😆 What's next to hear with your wild logic? That every single car is an amateurish piece of 💩 because prototypes and F1 cars are simply far better?

notebookcheck.net

LL

09.09.2023

Quote Incorrect. It is an option, in camera for both sRGB and Adobe RGB. Like i said it only matters for printing and usually high quality printings in nice magazines or publicity. Monitors people use are split is  this: worse than sRGB, sRGB(rec709 for video) while DCI-P3(rec.2020) are still rare. So anything taken in Adobe RGB need to be converted to sRGB to not look like crap in web or in your computer. This screen by the specs are much better than most. But your opinion is not surprising you have a very  messianic stance.

notebookcheck.net

NikoB

08.09.2023

Most professional photographic equipment shoots in AdobeRGB - it would be strange for someone to process photos in DCI-P3 or sRGB (this is done only for posting content on websites). In any case, the screen is not even close to being "outstanding". An ordinary screen for 2023, below average in terms of diagonal and color rendition and contrast and the actual bit depth of the matrix. And even more so with permission - because for really clear text in browsers based on the chromium engine, a minimum of 220-230 ppi is needed. Even Dell, to whose comment I once provided a link, answered the question why a 6k monitor - professionals prefer ppi above 230. And that says it all. And Acer has a cheap amateur screen that is below average.